← Back to home
Comparison · Support

Zammad vs Formbricks

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Zammad and Formbricks — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:open-source

Zammad vs Formbricks: at a glance

FeatureZammadFormbricks
SectorSupportSupport
Velocity score2.56.3
Sparks · 30d01
Top themeshelp-desk, open-source, alpha-releases, maintenanceopen-source, surveys, commercial-pivot, self-hosted
Last editorial update3mo ago6h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is Zammad?

Zammad inches toward 7.x on a slow alpha cadence with little feature signal

Zammad's visible changelog is sparse and maintenance-only. The recent entries are alpha version markers spaced months apart — 7.0.0-alpha in September 2025, 7.1.0-alpha in February 2026, 7.2.0-alpha in May 2026 — carrying little beyond version-info bumps and an earlier note about improved sensitive-data handling.

Read the full Zammad trajectory →

What is Formbricks?

Formbricks 6.0 RC cycle reveals commercial hardening: lower self-hosted cap, MCP OAuth, and Act as Beta

Formbricks is deep in the 6.0 release candidate cycle, with rc.5 landing today. The rc.1 drop was the meaningful one: the platform renamed its analytics module (Unify → Analyze), promoted Act to Beta status, lowered the unlicensed self-hosted workspace cap from unlimited to 1, and added MCP OAuth support. The 5.x maintenance branch is receiving parallel SSO and Redis fixes. The combined picture is a product tightening its commercial model ahead of a major version.

Read the full Formbricks trajectory →

Zammad vs Formbricks: editorial side-by-side

Z
Zammad
SUPPORT
2.5

Zammad inches toward 7.x on a slow alpha cadence with little feature signal

◆ Current state

Zammad's visible changelog is sparse and maintenance-only. The recent entries are alpha version markers spaced months apart — 7.0.0-alpha in September 2025, 7.1.0-alpha in February 2026, 7.2.0-alpha in May 2026 — carrying little beyond version-info bumps and an earlier note about improved sensitive-data handling.

◆ Where it's heading

The only clear signal is a slow march toward a 7.x release line, tagged through infrequent alpha cuts. What is actually changing inside this open-source help desk is not visible in these entries, so the substantive direction of 7.x remains unclear from the changelog alone.

◆ Prediction

A 7.x stable release is the likely eventual destination, but the alpha tags here do not reveal which features will define it.

F
Formbricks
SUPPORT
6.3

Formbricks 6.0 RC cycle reveals commercial hardening: lower self-hosted cap, MCP OAuth, and Act as Beta

◆ Current state

Formbricks is deep in the 6.0 release candidate cycle, with rc.5 landing today. The rc.1 drop was the meaningful one: the platform renamed its analytics module (Unify → Analyze), promoted Act to Beta status, lowered the unlicensed self-hosted workspace cap from unlimited to 1, and added MCP OAuth support. The 5.x maintenance branch is receiving parallel SSO and Redis fixes. The combined picture is a product tightening its commercial model ahead of a major version.

◆ Where it's heading

Formbricks is moving from open-source survey tool toward a commercially-gated platform with a more restricted self-hosted tier. The workspace cap reduction, contacts entitlement gating, and enrichment status indicators signal a deliberate push toward cloud and licensed deployments. The MCP OAuth addition keeps it relevant to AI tooling. The 6.0 release will likely formalize the Analyze/Act module split as the product's positioning around feedback intelligence, not just survey collection.

◆ Prediction

6.0 stable release is imminent given the rapid rc cycle. Expect commercial tier differentiation (Act features gated on license) to become clearer once the stable drops, and for the self-hosted community to feel the workspace cap immediately.

Alternatives to Zammad and Formbricks

Other Support products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Zammad or Formbricks.

See all Zammad alternatives → · See all Formbricks alternatives →

Recent activity from Zammad and Formbricks

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 7h agoFormbricks6.0.0 RC5: Helm Envoy safeguards
  2. 7h agoFormbricks6.0.0 RC4: Gateway API v1.5 support
  3. 10h agoFormbricks6.0.0 RC3: bug fixes and trial duration A/B test
  4. 6d agoFormbricks6.0.0 RC2: AuthZed health CLI fix
  5. 6d agoFormbricks6.0.0 RC1: commercial hardening, Act Beta, self-hosted cap
  6. 13d agoFormbricks5.4.2 RC1: Redis reliability backports
  7. 4mo agoZammad7.2.0 alpha: version maintenance
  8. 7mo agoZammad7.1.0 alpha: version maintenance
  9. 11mo agoZammad7.0.0 alpha: improved sensitive-data handling

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Zammad and Formbricks?

Both compete on the same themes — open-source — within Support. Formbricks is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 2.5), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Zammad better than Formbricks?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Formbricks is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 2.5), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Support products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Zammad?

Top Zammad alternatives in Support are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Zammad alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/zammad for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Formbricks?

Top Formbricks alternatives in Support are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Formbricks alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/formbricks for the full list with editorial commentary on each.