Bitrix24
Bitrix24's blog explains MCP for small teams; still no product releases.
A side-by-side editorial comparison of Planhat and Close CRM — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Planhat doubles down on automation — Portals, Task dependencies, AI steps, OAuth — for scaled CS ops.
Planhat's recent stream skews heavily toward automation infrastructure for customer-success teams. New advanced Task dependencies, automated end-to-end Portal setup, full execution logs for Automation Runs, and live company-field merge tags in Dashboards and Presentations all reduce the manual per-account work that defines mid-tier CSM tooling. OAuth connections enter Labs, replacing API-key plumbing for integrations.
Close turns caller ID into an automatic choice with Local Presence.
Close is shipping on three tracks: the Chloe assistant, calling, and admin controls. In November the calling side moved most, with Local Presence picking a recognized or local-looking number for each call and text, and outbound calls now playing a tone while they connect. Chloe Chat is generally available and draws charts on request, and October brought object renaming and a central Security page with OIDC SSO.
Planhat's recent stream skews heavily toward automation infrastructure for customer-success teams. New advanced Task dependencies, automated end-to-end Portal setup, full execution logs for Automation Runs, and live company-field merge tags in Dashboards and Presentations all reduce the manual per-account work that defines mid-tier CSM tooling. OAuth connections enter Labs, replacing API-key plumbing for integrations.
The product is moving from a health-score-and-playbook CS platform toward a low-code automation backbone for customer-success orgs. Recent additions of frontier LLMs (Claude Sonnet/Opus 4.6, GPT 5.4) into AI Automation steps, combined with portal-creation building blocks, position Planhat as a CS workflow engine that runs without per-account human babysitting.
Expect more native AI step types (action-taking, deeper retrieval), OAuth graduating out of Labs into the standard integrations surface, and continued investment in automation observability — failure analytics, retry policies, version history.
Close is shipping on three tracks: the Chloe assistant, calling, and admin controls. In November the calling side moved most, with Local Presence picking a recognized or local-looking number for each call and text, and outbound calls now playing a tone while they connect. Chloe Chat is generally available and draws charts on request, and October brought object renaming and a central Security page with OIDC SSO.
Calling and texting are getting the kind of automation Chloe brought to search and reporting, with Close making choices reps used to make by hand. The admin work points at larger teams that need renamed objects and central access control.
Expect more calling features that remove manual steps, such as number management or call outcome handling, alongside further Chloe chart and action types.
Other CRM products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Planhat or Close CRM.
Bitrix24's blog explains MCP for small teams; still no product releases.
Twenty 2.58.1 stops existing accounts from joining a workspace through SSO alone.
Twenty 2.58 rebuilds CRM permissions down to the row and adds MCP workflow steps.
GroupOffice patches its 25.0 and 6.8 lines again, still with no notes.
folk adds a command panel and quick-add tasks after its agent-era repositioning.
folk now pitches itself as the CRM for the agent era.
See all Planhat alternatives → · See all Close CRM alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Planhat and Close CRM are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 5.0 vs 5.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Planhat and Close CRM are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 5.0 vs 5.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other CRM products to evaluate alongside.
Top Planhat alternatives in CRM are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Planhat alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/planhat for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top Close CRM alternatives in CRM are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Close CRM alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/close-crm for the full list with editorial commentary on each.