← Back to home
Comparison · Support

Request Tracker vs Formbricks

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Request Tracker and Formbricks — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Request Tracker vs Formbricks: at a glance

FeatureRequest TrackerFormbricks
SectorSupportSupport
Velocity score5.05.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesticketing, security-releases, cve, mfasurveys, data retention, self-hosted, helm
Last editorial update12d ago1d ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is Request Tracker?

RT's October pair fixes at least 27 CVEs and finally adds TOTP MFA to 5.0 and 6.0.

Best Practical released RT 6.0.4 and 5.0.11 on 2026-10-29 as a coordinated security pair, with findings from CERT Polska. The notes list at least 27 CVEs, including a ticket-forwarding bypass that could email transactions from tickets the user cannot see, CSRF through the URL shortener that could grant SuperUser, and feed URLs that ran any search with the owner's rights. Both releases also add TOTP multi-factor authentication, configurable password policies and self-service password reset; 6.0.4 additionally rebuilds the attachments and links widgets and adds a lifecycle viewer.

Read the full Request Tracker trajectory →

What is Formbricks?

Formbricks 6.2 candidate two fixes Helm installs and response filters before stable.

Formbricks' 6.0 cycle renamed Unify to Analyze and added MCP OAuth, and 6.1 added the v3 responses API. 6.2.0-rc.1 brought data retention policies and shared show-conditions; rc.2 on November 12 is mostly fixes: fresh Helm installs with bundled PostgreSQL, Valkey templates across upgrades, consistent multi-status response filters and a themed signature pad. It also exposes embedded-data keys in chart pickers and includes a Cube config change for custom database roles.

Read the full Formbricks trajectory →

Request Tracker vs Formbricks: editorial side-by-side

R5.0

RT's October pair fixes at least 27 CVEs and finally adds TOTP MFA to 5.0 and 6.0.

◆ Current state

Best Practical released RT 6.0.4 and 5.0.11 on 2026-10-29 as a coordinated security pair, with findings from CERT Polska. The notes list at least 27 CVEs, including a ticket-forwarding bypass that could email transactions from tickets the user cannot see, CSRF through the URL shortener that could grant SuperUser, and feed URLs that ran any search with the owner's rights. Both releases also add TOTP multi-factor authentication, configurable password policies and self-service password reset; 6.0.4 additionally rebuilds the attachments and links widgets and adds a lifecycle viewer.

◆ Where it's heading

Security still sets RT's calendar: the May pair and the October pair both landed on one day across branches. What changed is that authentication features now ship on 5.0 as well as 6.0, rather than feature work staying on 6.0 only. The 4.4 branch had its final release in October 2025, so the active lines are now 5.0 and 6.0.

◆ Prediction

The next release is likely another same-day 5.0 and 6.0 pair driven by security reports; the size of this batch suggests follow-up fixes could come sooner than the usual gap of several months.

F
Formbricks
SUPPORT
5.0

Formbricks 6.2 candidate two fixes Helm installs and response filters before stable.

◆ Current state

Formbricks' 6.0 cycle renamed Unify to Analyze and added MCP OAuth, and 6.1 added the v3 responses API. 6.2.0-rc.1 brought data retention policies and shared show-conditions; rc.2 on November 12 is mostly fixes: fresh Helm installs with bundled PostgreSQL, Valkey templates across upgrades, consistent multi-status response filters and a themed signature pad. It also exposes embedded-data keys in chart pickers and includes a Cube config change for custom database roles.

◆ Where it's heading

Formbricks keeps building controls for larger self-hosted customers, retention rules and scoped APIs, while much of each candidate goes to its Helm and Compose packaging. The feed still shows release candidates rather than stable tags.

◆ Prediction

Expect one or two more 6.2 candidates of deployment fixes before a stable 6.2.0, likely within two weeks given the rc.1 to rc.2 gap.

Alternatives to Request Tracker and Formbricks

Other Support products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Request Tracker or Formbricks.

See all Request Tracker alternatives → · See all Formbricks alternatives →

Recent activity from Request Tracker and Formbricks

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 2d agoFormbricks6.2.0-rc.2
  2. 5d agoFormbricksFormbricks 6.2 RC1 adds data retention policies
  3. 15d agoRequest TrackerRT 6.0.4 fixes dozens of CVEs and adds TOTP MFA
  4. 15d agoRequest TrackerRT 5.0.11 fixes dozens of CVEs and adds TOTP MFA
  5. 26d agoFormbricks6.1 RC3: race-proof workspace cap and online-upgrade fixes
  6. 28d agoFormbricks6.1 RC2: v3 API validation, incremental extraction, upgrade fixes
  7. 1mo agoFormbricks6.1 RC1: v3 responses API, MCP response access, webhook jobs
  8. 1mo agoFormbricks6.0.0 RC5: Helm Envoy safeguards
  9. 5mo agoRequest TrackerSecurity release fixes REST 2.0 credential leak and SQL injection
  10. 5mo agoRequest TrackerSame security fixes as 5.0.10, plus dashboard and accessibility work
  11. 1y agoRequest TrackerCalendar view for saved searches and memory management work
  12. 1y agoRequest TrackerCSV injection fix in TSV export, with assorted updates

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Request Tracker and Formbricks?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Request Tracker and Formbricks are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 5.0 vs 5.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Request Tracker better than Formbricks?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Request Tracker and Formbricks are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 5.0 vs 5.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Support products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Request Tracker?

Top Request Tracker alternatives in Support are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Request Tracker alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/request-tracker for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Formbricks?

Top Formbricks alternatives in Support are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Formbricks alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/formbricks for the full list with editorial commentary on each.