← Back to home
Comparison · Comms

Roundcube vs Rocket.Chat

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Roundcube and Rocket.Chat — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Roundcube vs Rocket.Chat: at a glance

FeatureRoundcubeRocket.Chat
SectorCommsComms
Velocity score5.06.3
Sparks · 30d01
Top themessecurity, xss, ssrf, email-securityteam-chat, voice-calling, screen-sharing, self-hosted
Last editorial update7d ago15d ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is Roundcube?

Roundcube patches 28+ vulnerabilities across two branches in a five-month hardening sprint

Roundcube has shipped six security releases across its main 1.7.x and LTS 1.6.x branches since June, patching a cumulative 28+ vulnerabilities including an RCE via the markasjunk plugin's cmd_learn driver, IMAP command injection through LITERAL+ byte-count desynchronization, multiple SSRF bypasses, cross-user contact group access, and zero-click stored XSS. The simultaneous dual-branch cadence shows active maintenance of both lines.

Read the full Roundcube trajectory →

What is Rocket.Chat?

Rocket.Chat finishes the 8.8 calling work while the licence wall for SSO gets a date.

The 8.8 candidate line is winding down. rc.2 is a bare Meteor version bump with no user-visible change, following rc.1 which promoted Voice Call Screen Sharing to stable and turned on the in-room call interface for every call, screen sharing available or not, alongside repairs to a message list that could quietly load a whole room's history in the background. The release that still defines the line is rc.0: LDAP and SAML deprecated on non-Premium workspaces with 9.0.0 named as the cutoff, forced end-to-end encryption for new private rooms, classification banners for ABAC-managed rooms, and the apps-engine default runtime moved from Deno to Node.

Read the full Rocket.Chat trajectory →

Roundcube vs Rocket.Chat: editorial side-by-side

R5.0

Roundcube patches 28+ vulnerabilities across two branches in a five-month hardening sprint

◆ Current state

Roundcube has shipped six security releases across its main 1.7.x and LTS 1.6.x branches since June, patching a cumulative 28+ vulnerabilities including an RCE via the markasjunk plugin's cmd_learn driver, IMAP command injection through LITERAL+ byte-count desynchronization, multiple SSRF bypasses, cross-user contact group access, and zero-click stored XSS. The simultaneous dual-branch cadence shows active maintenance of both lines.

◆ Where it's heading

The volume and variety of external security reports — from Horizon3.ai, Samsung R&D, pwn.ai, and independent researchers — indicates Roundcube's attack surface is under sustained scrutiny. The 1.7.0 release in May introduced meaningful features (Markdown rendering, improved OAuth2/OIDC, mandatory public_html entry point), but the months since have been consumed by patching. Feature development on 1.7.x appears paused until the security debt settles.

◆ Prediction

Another paired security release across 1.7.x and 1.6.x is likely within 6-8 weeks given the cadence. The SSRF and CSS parsing issues have required multiple iterations to close fully, suggesting the hardening work isn't finished.

Rocket.Chat logo6.3

Rocket.Chat finishes the 8.8 calling work while the licence wall for SSO gets a date.

◆ Current state

The 8.8 candidate line is winding down. rc.2 is a bare Meteor version bump with no user-visible change, following rc.1 which promoted Voice Call Screen Sharing to stable and turned on the in-room call interface for every call, screen sharing available or not, alongside repairs to a message list that could quietly load a whole room's history in the background. The release that still defines the line is rc.0: LDAP and SAML deprecated on non-Premium workspaces with 9.0.0 named as the cutoff, forced end-to-end encryption for new private rooms, classification banners for ABAC-managed rooms, and the apps-engine default runtime moved from Deno to Node.

◆ Where it's heading

Two threads run at once and point in different directions. The calling stack keeps maturing on its own — voice, then screen sharing, now a consistent in-room surface for both — which is Rocket.Chat absorbing functions its users would otherwise reach for a separate tool to get. Against that, the 9.0 licence requirement for LDAP and SAML sorts the install base: regulated and government deployments that will pay, and unlicensed self-hosted workspaces that were there for the absence of a per-seat bill. The rc train itself has settled into a familiar shape, one substantive rc.0 followed by bumps and fixes.

◆ Prediction

Expect 8.8 to go final once the message-list fixes settle, with the LDAP and SAML licence requirement, not any calling feature, as the story of 9.0. The open question is whether the Deno-to-Node runtime switch surfaces app compatibility reports before then.

Alternatives to Roundcube and Rocket.Chat

Other Comms products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Roundcube or Rocket.Chat.

See all Roundcube alternatives → · See all Rocket.Chat alternatives →

Recent activity from Roundcube and Rocket.Chat

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 10d agoRoundcubeRoundcube Webmail 1.7.4
  2. 10d agoRoundcubeRoundcube Webmail 1.6.19
  3. 16d agoRocket.Chat8.8.0-rc.2: Meteor version bump only
  4. 18d agoRocket.ChatScreen sharing goes stable; in-room call UI for every call
  5. 26d agoRocket.Chat8.8.0-rc.0: LDAP/SAML go Premium in 9.0, forced private-room E2EE
  6. 1mo agoRoundcubeRoundcube Webmail 1.7.3
  7. 1mo agoRoundcubeRoundcube Webmail 1.6.18
  8. 1mo agoRocket.Chat8.7.0-rc.6: Meteor version bump only
  9. 1mo agoRocket.Chat8.7.0-rc.5: Meteor version bump only
  10. 1mo agoRocket.Chat8.7.0-rc.4: audio attachments become seekable again
  11. 2mo agoRoundcubeRoundcube Webmail 1.6.17
  12. 2mo agoRoundcubeRoundcube Webmail 1.7.2

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Roundcube and Rocket.Chat?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Rocket.Chat is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 5.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Roundcube better than Rocket.Chat?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Rocket.Chat is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 5.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Comms products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Roundcube?

Top Roundcube alternatives in Comms are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Roundcube alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/roundcube for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Rocket.Chat?

Top Rocket.Chat alternatives in Comms are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Rocket.Chat alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rocketchat for the full list with editorial commentary on each.