← Back to home
Comparison · Comms

Rocket.Chat vs Element

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Rocket.Chat and Element — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:self-hosted

Rocket.Chat vs Element: at a glance

FeatureRocket.ChatElement
SectorCommsComms
Velocity score6.35.0
Sparks · 30d10
Top themesteam-chat, voice-calling, screen-sharing, self-hostedmatrix, open-source, messaging, mvvm
Last editorial update15d ago2h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is Rocket.Chat?

Rocket.Chat finishes the 8.8 calling work while the licence wall for SSO gets a date.

The 8.8 candidate line is winding down. rc.2 is a bare Meteor version bump with no user-visible change, following rc.1 which promoted Voice Call Screen Sharing to stable and turned on the in-room call interface for every call, screen sharing available or not, alongside repairs to a message list that could quietly load a whole room's history in the background. The release that still defines the line is rc.0: LDAP and SAML deprecated on non-Premium workspaces with 9.0.0 named as the cutoff, forced end-to-end encryption for new private rooms, classification banners for ABAC-managed rooms, and the apps-engine default runtime moved from Deno to Node.

Read the full Rocket.Chat trajectory →

What is Element?

Element rebuilds its timeline with MVVM architecture while cutting legacy OS support in v1.12.28.

Element, the open-source Matrix messaging client, ships on a stable two-week release cadence and is currently at v1.12.28. The project is mid-way through a multi-part Timeline MVVM refactor (parts 1 and 2 in v1.12.26 and v1.12.27), restructuring the core room timeline component. The v1.12.28 release raises the minimum glibc requirement to 2.34, ending support for Debian bullseye and Ubuntu releases older than 22.04.

Read the full Element trajectory →

Rocket.Chat vs Element: editorial side-by-side

Rocket.Chat logo6.3

Rocket.Chat finishes the 8.8 calling work while the licence wall for SSO gets a date.

◆ Current state

The 8.8 candidate line is winding down. rc.2 is a bare Meteor version bump with no user-visible change, following rc.1 which promoted Voice Call Screen Sharing to stable and turned on the in-room call interface for every call, screen sharing available or not, alongside repairs to a message list that could quietly load a whole room's history in the background. The release that still defines the line is rc.0: LDAP and SAML deprecated on non-Premium workspaces with 9.0.0 named as the cutoff, forced end-to-end encryption for new private rooms, classification banners for ABAC-managed rooms, and the apps-engine default runtime moved from Deno to Node.

◆ Where it's heading

Two threads run at once and point in different directions. The calling stack keeps maturing on its own — voice, then screen sharing, now a consistent in-room surface for both — which is Rocket.Chat absorbing functions its users would otherwise reach for a separate tool to get. Against that, the 9.0 licence requirement for LDAP and SAML sorts the install base: regulated and government deployments that will pay, and unlicensed self-hosted workspaces that were there for the absence of a per-seat bill. The rc train itself has settled into a familiar shape, one substantive rc.0 followed by bumps and fixes.

◆ Prediction

Expect 8.8 to go final once the message-list fixes settle, with the LDAP and SAML licence requirement, not any calling feature, as the story of 9.0. The open question is whether the Deno-to-Node runtime switch surfaces app compatibility reports before then.

E
Element
COMMS
5.0

Element rebuilds its timeline with MVVM architecture while cutting legacy OS support in v1.12.28.

◆ Current state

Element, the open-source Matrix messaging client, ships on a stable two-week release cadence and is currently at v1.12.28. The project is mid-way through a multi-part Timeline MVVM refactor (parts 1 and 2 in v1.12.26 and v1.12.27), restructuring the core room timeline component. The v1.12.28 release raises the minimum glibc requirement to 2.34, ending support for Debian bullseye and Ubuntu releases older than 22.04.

◆ Where it's heading

The Timeline MVVM series is the defining architectural investment of this window — replacing the legacy timeline rendering with a proper view-model separation. This is foundational work that typically precedes faster feature delivery on the timeline surface (thread UX, call integration, richer message types). Parallel work promoting Custom Themes to devtools and updating bundle configurations signals cleanup of the extension and theming surface alongside the core refactor.

◆ Prediction

A Timeline MVVM part 3 or final integration is the immediate next step; once complete, expect improved thread UX or voice/video call timeline integration as the first beneficiaries of the new architecture.

Alternatives to Rocket.Chat and Element

Other Comms products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Rocket.Chat or Element.

See all Rocket.Chat alternatives → · See all Element alternatives →

Recent activity from Rocket.Chat and Element

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 7h agoElementElement v1.12.28: glibc 2.34 minimum, drops Debian bullseye
  2. 7d agoElementElement Banner module v2.0.0
  3. 7d agoElementElement v1.12.28-rc.1
  4. 7d agoElementElement v1.12.28-rc.0
  5. 15d agoElementElement v1.12.27: Timeline MVVM part 2
  6. 16d agoRocket.Chat8.8.0-rc.2: Meteor version bump only
  7. 18d agoRocket.ChatScreen sharing goes stable; in-room call UI for every call
  8. 19d agoElementElement v1.12.27-rc.1
  9. 26d agoRocket.Chat8.8.0-rc.0: LDAP/SAML go Premium in 9.0, forced private-room E2EE
  10. 1mo agoRocket.Chat8.7.0-rc.6: Meteor version bump only
  11. 1mo agoRocket.Chat8.7.0-rc.5: Meteor version bump only
  12. 1mo agoRocket.Chat8.7.0-rc.4: audio attachments become seekable again

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Rocket.Chat and Element?

Both compete on the same themes — self-hosted — within Comms. Rocket.Chat is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 5.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Rocket.Chat better than Element?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Rocket.Chat is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 5.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Comms products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Rocket.Chat?

Top Rocket.Chat alternatives in Comms are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Rocket.Chat alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rocketchat for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Element?

Top Element alternatives in Comms are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Element alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/element-web for the full list with editorial commentary on each.