Element
Element rebuilds its timeline with MVVM architecture while cutting legacy OS support in v1.12.28.
Comparison · Comms
Openfire vs Rocket.Chat
A side-by-side editorial comparison of Openfire and Rocket.Chat — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:self-hosted
Openfire vs Rocket.Chat: at a glance
What is Openfire?
Openfire keeps its XMPP server current without changing what it is.
Openfire ships a maintenance release every one to two months, each a mix of dependency upgrades, MUC and pubsub correctness fixes, and occasional security hardening. 5.1.2 follows that shape exactly: Jetty, log4j2, and the PostgreSQL driver moved forward, three inapplicable Tomcat CVEs suppressed, and a set of MUC self-ping errors corrected to return the right XMPP error types. The last release with real feature content was 5.1.0 in June, which added channel binding and an admin console for failed server-to-server connections.
What is Rocket.Chat?
Rocket.Chat finishes the 8.8 calling work while the licence wall for SSO gets a date.
The 8.8 candidate line is winding down. rc.2 is a bare Meteor version bump with no user-visible change, following rc.1 which promoted Voice Call Screen Sharing to stable and turned on the in-room call interface for every call, screen sharing available or not, alongside repairs to a message list that could quietly load a whole room's history in the background. The release that still defines the line is rc.0: LDAP and SAML deprecated on non-Premium workspaces with 9.0.0 named as the cutoff, forced end-to-end encryption for new private rooms, classification banners for ABAC-managed rooms, and the apps-engine default runtime moved from Deno to Node.
Openfire vs Rocket.Chat: editorial side-by-side
Openfire
2.5COMMS
Openfire keeps its XMPP server current without changing what it is.
◆ Current state
Openfire ships a maintenance release every one to two months, each a mix of dependency upgrades, MUC and pubsub correctness fixes, and occasional security hardening. 5.1.2 follows that shape exactly: Jetty, log4j2, and the PostgreSQL driver moved forward, three inapplicable Tomcat CVEs suppressed, and a set of MUC self-ping errors corrected to return the right XMPP error types. The last release with real feature content was 5.1.0 in June, which added channel binding and an admin console for failed server-to-server connections.
◆ Where it's heading
The project's direction is protocol conformance and operational currency rather than new capability. Recent cycles have gone into XEP compliance details - self-ping error semantics, XEP-0398 presence handling, base64 whitespace tolerance - and into keeping the dependency tree clean enough to pass a scanner. That is a reasonable posture for infrastructure a decade into deployment, and nothing in the last six releases suggests a change of scope.
◆ Prediction
Expect the same cadence: another patch in four to eight weeks carrying library bumps and MUC or pubsub conformance fixes, with anything larger held for a 5.2 line.
Rocket.Chat
6.3COMMS
Rocket.Chat finishes the 8.8 calling work while the licence wall for SSO gets a date.
◆ Current state
The 8.8 candidate line is winding down. rc.2 is a bare Meteor version bump with no user-visible change, following rc.1 which promoted Voice Call Screen Sharing to stable and turned on the in-room call interface for every call, screen sharing available or not, alongside repairs to a message list that could quietly load a whole room's history in the background. The release that still defines the line is rc.0: LDAP and SAML deprecated on non-Premium workspaces with 9.0.0 named as the cutoff, forced end-to-end encryption for new private rooms, classification banners for ABAC-managed rooms, and the apps-engine default runtime moved from Deno to Node.
◆ Where it's heading
Two threads run at once and point in different directions. The calling stack keeps maturing on its own — voice, then screen sharing, now a consistent in-room surface for both — which is Rocket.Chat absorbing functions its users would otherwise reach for a separate tool to get. Against that, the 9.0 licence requirement for LDAP and SAML sorts the install base: regulated and government deployments that will pay, and unlicensed self-hosted workspaces that were there for the absence of a per-seat bill. The rc train itself has settled into a familiar shape, one substantive rc.0 followed by bumps and fixes.
◆ Prediction
Expect 8.8 to go final once the message-list fixes settle, with the LDAP and SAML licence requirement, not any calling feature, as the story of 9.0. The open question is whether the Deno-to-Node runtime switch surfaces app compatibility reports before then.
Alternatives to Openfire and Rocket.Chat
Other Comms products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Openfire or Rocket.Chat.
Superhuman
Superhuman rebuilt its mobile apps and wired every inbox into AI assistants — the email client is becoming a suite.
Chatwoot
Chatwoot is building an AI-first support platform, with Captain gaining audience targeting and macro automation reaching the keyboard-native workflow.
Signal Desktop
Signal adds granular notification controls: badge content, muted threads, restore defaults
Zoho Cliq
Zoho Cliq 7.0 bets on AI conversation summaries and Neat hardware to close the gap with enterprise messaging platforms
Krisp
Krisp adds deepfake detection and expands Voice Translation as its Call Center AI platform deepens enterprise compliance tools.
See all Openfire alternatives → · See all Rocket.Chat alternatives →
Recent activity from Openfire and Rocket.Chat
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 16d agoRocket.Chat8.8.0-rc.2: Meteor version bump only
- 18d agoRocket.ChatScreen sharing goes stable; in-room call UI for every call
- 26d agoRocket.Chat8.8.0-rc.0: LDAP/SAML go Premium in 9.0, forced private-room E2EE ⚡
- 1mo agoOpenfireOpenfire 5.1.2: MUC self-ping errors and library upgrades
- 1mo agoRocket.Chat8.7.0-rc.6: Meteor version bump only
- 1mo agoRocket.Chat8.7.0-rc.5: Meteor version bump only
- 1mo agoRocket.Chat8.7.0-rc.4: audio attachments become seekable again
- 2mo agoOpenfireOpenfire 5.1.1: MUC and pubsub subscription fixes
- 3mo agoOpenfireChannel binding support and S2S connection diagnostics
- 4mo agoOpenfireOpenfire 5.0.5: dependency currency and logging fixes
- 6mo agoOpenfireFixes high CPU from exception-based control flow
- 9mo agoOpenfireOpenfire 5.0.3: driver upgrades and MUC fixes
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between Openfire and Rocket.Chat?
Both compete on the same themes — self-hosted — within Comms. Rocket.Chat is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 2.5), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is Openfire better than Rocket.Chat?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Rocket.Chat is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 2.5), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Comms products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to Openfire?
Top Openfire alternatives in Comms are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Openfire alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/openfire for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to Rocket.Chat?
Top Rocket.Chat alternatives in Comms are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Rocket.Chat alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rocketchat for the full list with editorial commentary on each.