← Back to home
Comparison · Collab

Trilium Notes vs Joplin

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Trilium Notes and Joplin — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:note-takingmcp

Trilium Notes vs Joplin: at a glance

FeatureTrilium NotesJoplin
SectorCollabCollab
Velocity score6.36.3
Sparks · 30d11
Top themesself-hosted, note-taking, knowledge-base, mcpnote-taking, ai-integration, privacy, mcp
Last editorial update26d ago1d ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is Trilium Notes?

Trilium spent a year adding what notes can hold; now it is fixing what happens to them.

Trilium Notes is a self-hosted hierarchical note application with an unusually broad content model — text, code, canvases, mind maps, and since 0.103.0 spreadsheets with formulas and OCR-extracted text from images, PDFs and Office files. Releases are large, quarterly, and explicit about breakage. The current release turns that attention inward: the database itself becomes something you can measure, clean, repair, and restore.

Read the full Trilium Notes trajectory →

What is Joplin?

Joplin 3.7 ships AI chat, semantic search, and MCP integration — all off by default, all controllable by the user.

Joplin 3.7 is the product's first real AI release: an in-app chat panel for querying the currently open note, semantic (meaning-based) search across notebooks, and an MCP server that lets external AI assistants connect to Joplin's note graph. The implementation is privacy-first by design — AI is disabled by default, local models (Ollama, LM Studio) are explicitly supported, and cloud AI services only receive the specific note content relevant to a request rather than the full notebook. A companion documentation post published September 14 lays out the privacy model explicitly.

Read the full Joplin trajectory →

Trilium Notes vs Joplin: editorial side-by-side

T6.3

Trilium spent a year adding what notes can hold; now it is fixing what happens to them.

◆ Current state

Trilium Notes is a self-hosted hierarchical note application with an unusually broad content model — text, code, canvases, mind maps, and since 0.103.0 spreadsheets with formulas and OCR-extracted text from images, PDFs and Office files. Releases are large, quarterly, and explicit about breakage. The current release turns that attention inward: the database itself becomes something you can measure, clean, repair, and restore.

◆ Where it's heading

Two arcs run in parallel. One expands what a note can be, peaking with the spreadsheet note type and OCR that feeds extracted text into search. The other is about trust in the thing holding your knowledge base — a coordinated security release in April, then 0.105.0 shipping backup restore, a cleanup tool that honours versioning limits, compaction, integrity repair, and a space-usage treemap. The AI layer is being made self-hostable in the same spirit, moving from a fixed vendor model list to dynamic retrieval plus Ollama, LM Studio and any OpenAI-compatible provider. Breaking changes are frequent and documented up front rather than smuggled in.

◆ Prediction

The two features the maintainer explicitly links to funding — an official mobile application and multi-user support — are the stated backlog; nearer term, expect the spreadsheet note type to leave beta and the newly networked MCP interface to gain more surface.

J
Joplin
COLLAB
6.3

Joplin 3.7 ships AI chat, semantic search, and MCP integration — all off by default, all controllable by the user.

◆ Current state

Joplin 3.7 is the product's first real AI release: an in-app chat panel for querying the currently open note, semantic (meaning-based) search across notebooks, and an MCP server that lets external AI assistants connect to Joplin's note graph. The implementation is privacy-first by design — AI is disabled by default, local models (Ollama, LM Studio) are explicitly supported, and cloud AI services only receive the specific note content relevant to a request rather than the full notebook. A companion documentation post published September 14 lays out the privacy model explicitly.

◆ Where it's heading

Joplin is repositioning from a sync-agnostic note-taking app into an AI-native knowledge base, differentiated by opt-in, local-first controls. The HMD Terra M preload partnership and the warrant canary point to a deliberate push toward privacy-conscious enterprise and professional users who distrust cloud-first tools. The MCP integration is particularly strategic: it makes Joplin's note graph accessible to external orchestration pipelines without locking into any particular AI provider.

◆ Prediction

The next major release will likely expand AI chat to multi-note context — currently limited to the open note — and add more configurable MCP tools. The HTR (handwritten text recognition) project from the 2024 French government partnership is also likely to appear in a near-term release.

Alternatives to Trilium Notes and Joplin

Other Collab products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Trilium Notes or Joplin.

See all Trilium Notes alternatives → · See all Joplin alternatives →

Recent activity from Trilium Notes and Joplin

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 2d agoJoplinYour notes and AI: privacy first
  2. 16d agoJoplinWhat's new in Joplin 3.7
  3. 27d agoTrilium NotesBackups become restorable and the database becomes manageable
  4. 1mo agoTrilium NotesLLM providers become dynamic and self-hostable; OneNote import hardened
  5. 2mo agoTrilium NotesRelease-preparation tag for v0.104.0
  6. 4mo agoTrilium NotesSpreadsheet notes and OCR-backed search arrive
  7. 4mo agoJoplinWhat's new in Joplin 3.6
  8. 5mo agoTrilium NotesCoordinated security release across content handling and the desktop app
  9. 6mo agoTrilium NotesHotfix for mind map rendering and PDF viewer regressions
  10. 6mo agoJoplinIntroducing our Warrant Canary
  11. 7mo agoJoplinJoplin will come preloaded on the HMD Terra M
  12. 8mo agoJoplinWhat's new in Joplin 3.5

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Trilium Notes and Joplin?

Both compete on the same themes — note-taking, mcp — within Collab. Trilium Notes and Joplin are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 6.3 vs 6.3, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Trilium Notes better than Joplin?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Trilium Notes and Joplin are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 6.3 vs 6.3, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Collab products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Trilium Notes?

Top Trilium Notes alternatives in Collab are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Trilium Notes alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/trilium for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Joplin?

Top Joplin alternatives in Collab are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Joplin alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/joplin for the full list with editorial commentary on each.