← Back to home
Comparison · Comms

Maddy vs Stalwart

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Maddy and Stalwart — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:self-hosted

Maddy vs Stalwart: at a glance

FeatureMaddyStalwart
SectorCommsComms
Velocity score0.06.3
Sparks · 30d01
Top themesmail-server, self-hosted, golang, zero-downtime-reloademail-server, scim, jmap, enterprise-provisioning
Last editorial update1mo ago8d ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is Maddy?

A one-binary mail server learning to behave like production infrastructure.

maddy is an all-in-one SMTP and IMAP server written in Go, aimed at people who want a working mail host without assembling Postfix, Dovecot and a policy daemon themselves. The 0.9 line moved quickly — 0.9.0 through 0.9.5 between late March and late May — with the sequence following a recognisable shape: a feature release, an immediate patch for a broken integration, a security release, then cleanup. Configuration is directive-based, and much of the changelog concerns the behaviour of individual modules like auth.ldap, check.rspamd and check.dnsbl.

Read the full Maddy trajectory →

What is Stalwart?

Stalwart adds full SCIM v2 provisioning and 24-language calendar support as its standards coverage extends further than most commercial mail servers.

Stalwart is maintaining a weekly-or-faster release cadence, with alternating feature releases and dense bug-fix releases. The v0.16.20 release landed full SCIM v2 (Enterprise) including cursor-based pagination and the IPSIE lifecycle profile, conference links in calendar invites, and 24 new calendar interface translations. Below the feature line, the project is steadily closing correctness gaps across JMAP, CalDAV, IMAP, and MTA — many of them edge-case RFC compliance issues.

Read the full Stalwart trajectory →

Maddy vs Stalwart: editorial side-by-side

M
Maddy
COMMS
0.0

A one-binary mail server learning to behave like production infrastructure.

◆ Current state

maddy is an all-in-one SMTP and IMAP server written in Go, aimed at people who want a working mail host without assembling Postfix, Dovecot and a policy daemon themselves. The 0.9 line moved quickly — 0.9.0 through 0.9.5 between late March and late May — with the sequence following a recognisable shape: a feature release, an immediate patch for a broken integration, a security release, then cleanup. Configuration is directive-based, and much of the changelog concerns the behaviour of individual modules like auth.ldap, check.rspamd and check.dnsbl.

◆ Where it's heading

The project is systematically removing the compromises that made early versions convenient. Obsolete SASL LOGIN was disabled by default, the STARTTLS plaintext fallback was dropped, the maddyctl symlink behaviour and the implicit run command were deleted after four years of deprecation warnings, and libdns providers that have not kept up with 1.x are being cut. Running the other way is operational maturity: no-downtime config reload, queue-length metrics, OpenMetrics fixes, systemd readiness reporting, and SLSA build attestations on release artifacts. This is a project moving from hobbyist-friendly to operator-friendly, and accepting breakage to get there.

◆ Prediction

0.10.0 is already scoped by the deprecations announced in 0.9.1 — expect the flagged libdns providers to be removed and gandi to require Bearer tokens. Given the 0.9.x pattern, a feature release followed quickly by an integration fix is the likely shape.

S6.3

Stalwart adds full SCIM v2 provisioning and 24-language calendar support as its standards coverage extends further than most commercial mail servers.

◆ Current state

Stalwart is maintaining a weekly-or-faster release cadence, with alternating feature releases and dense bug-fix releases. The v0.16.20 release landed full SCIM v2 (Enterprise) including cursor-based pagination and the IPSIE lifecycle profile, conference links in calendar invites, and 24 new calendar interface translations. Below the feature line, the project is steadily closing correctness gaps across JMAP, CalDAV, IMAP, and MTA — many of them edge-case RFC compliance issues.

◆ Where it's heading

Stalwart is building toward parity with commercial enterprise mail servers on identity federation and provisioning (SCIM v2, VAPID for web push, DMARCbis/DKIM2 already landed). The pace of RFC implementation is unusually aggressive for an open-source project; the combination of JMAP, CalDAV, IMAP UIDONLY/UIDBATCHES, and SCIM v2 positions it as a viable self-hosted alternative for organizations that need standards compliance without vendor lock-in.

◆ Prediction

WebAuthn/passkey-based authentication and improved multi-tenant administration tooling are the most likely next capability additions, given the current trajectory toward enterprise identity management.

Alternatives to Maddy and Stalwart

Other Comms products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Maddy or Stalwart.

See all Maddy alternatives → · See all Stalwart alternatives →

Recent activity from Maddy and Stalwart

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 10d agoStalwartv0.16.21
  2. 17d agoStalwartv0.16.20
  3. 23d agoStalwartv0.16.19
  4. 29d agoStalwartv0.16.18
  5. 1mo agoStalwartv0.16.17
  6. 1mo agoStalwartv0.16.16
  7. 3mo agoMaddymaddy 0.9.5 fixes nested pipeline logging and systemd reload reporting
  8. 4mo agoMaddymaddy 0.9.4 removes the maddyctl symlink and implicit run command
  9. 5mo agoMaddymaddy 0.9.3 patches an LDAP injection flaw in auth.ldap
  10. 5mo agoMaddymaddy 0.9.2 fixes an rspamd panic on unspecified tls_client
  11. 5mo agoMaddymaddy 0.9.1 flags libdns providers for removal in 0.10.0
  12. 5mo agoMaddymaddy 0.9.0 adds no-downtime configuration reloading

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Maddy and Stalwart?

Both compete on the same themes — self-hosted — within Comms. Stalwart is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Maddy better than Stalwart?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Stalwart is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Comms products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Maddy?

Top Maddy alternatives in Comms are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Maddy alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/maddy for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Stalwart?

Top Stalwart alternatives in Comms are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Stalwart alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/stalwart for the full list with editorial commentary on each.