← Back to home
Comparison · Comms

Friendica vs Stalwart

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Friendica and Stalwart — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:self-hosted

Friendica vs Stalwart: at a glance

FeatureFriendicaStalwart
SectorCommsComms
Velocity score0.06.3
Sparks · 30d01
Top themesfediverse, activitypub, bluesky-bridge, self-hostedemail-server, scim, jmap, enterprise-provisioning
Last editorial update1mo ago8d ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is Friendica?

Friendica keeps betting on being the fediverse node that speaks everyone else's protocols.

Friendica is a self-hosted decentralised social platform, released on calendar versions two or three times a year with codenames and a consistent structure: a handful of highlights, a security-fix credit, and a pointer to the changelog. The recent run — 2023.12, 2024.03, 2024.08, 2024.12, 2026.01, 2026.05 — shows the cadence thinning, with a full year between 2024.12 and 2026.01. Nearly every release credits externally reported security issues, most recently from Doyensec working with Mastodon.

Read the full Friendica trajectory →

What is Stalwart?

Stalwart adds full SCIM v2 provisioning and 24-language calendar support as its standards coverage extends further than most commercial mail servers.

Stalwart is maintaining a weekly-or-faster release cadence, with alternating feature releases and dense bug-fix releases. The v0.16.20 release landed full SCIM v2 (Enterprise) including cursor-based pagination and the IPSIE lifecycle profile, conference links in calendar invites, and 24 new calendar interface translations. Below the feature line, the project is steadily closing correctness gaps across JMAP, CalDAV, IMAP, and MTA — many of them edge-case RFC compliance issues.

Read the full Stalwart trajectory →

Friendica vs Stalwart: editorial side-by-side

F0.0

Friendica keeps betting on being the fediverse node that speaks everyone else's protocols.

◆ Current state

Friendica is a self-hosted decentralised social platform, released on calendar versions two or three times a year with codenames and a consistent structure: a handful of highlights, a security-fix credit, and a pointer to the changelog. The recent run — 2023.12, 2024.03, 2024.08, 2024.12, 2026.01, 2026.05 — shows the cadence thinning, with a full year between 2024.12 and 2026.01. Nearly every release credits externally reported security issues, most recently from Doyensec working with Mastodon.

◆ Where it's heading

Two lines of work dominate. The first is connectors: an initial Bluesky bridge in 2023.05 made bi-directional by 2023.12, Tumblr support maintained throughout, and ATproto account integration plus Bridgy Fed support improved in 2026.05. The second is Channels — the user-defined algorithm for sorting the network stream — introduced in 2023.12 and given performance and sorting work in every release since. Running against both is a deliberate pruning of legacy: OStatus dropped in 2024.12 after the project measured how few servers still needed it, and the fancybox addon deprecated alongside it.

◆ Prediction

Expect the next release to continue the ATproto and Bridgy Fed integration work and further Channels performance tuning, with the accessibility review started in 2026.01 producing more fixes. Given the year-long gap before 2026.01, the cadence itself is the uncertain part.

S6.3

Stalwart adds full SCIM v2 provisioning and 24-language calendar support as its standards coverage extends further than most commercial mail servers.

◆ Current state

Stalwart is maintaining a weekly-or-faster release cadence, with alternating feature releases and dense bug-fix releases. The v0.16.20 release landed full SCIM v2 (Enterprise) including cursor-based pagination and the IPSIE lifecycle profile, conference links in calendar invites, and 24 new calendar interface translations. Below the feature line, the project is steadily closing correctness gaps across JMAP, CalDAV, IMAP, and MTA — many of them edge-case RFC compliance issues.

◆ Where it's heading

Stalwart is building toward parity with commercial enterprise mail servers on identity federation and provisioning (SCIM v2, VAPID for web push, DMARCbis/DKIM2 already landed). The pace of RFC implementation is unusually aggressive for an open-source project; the combination of JMAP, CalDAV, IMAP UIDONLY/UIDBATCHES, and SCIM v2 positions it as a viable self-hosted alternative for organizations that need standards compliance without vendor lock-in.

◆ Prediction

WebAuthn/passkey-based authentication and improved multi-tenant administration tooling are the most likely next capability additions, given the current trajectory toward enterprise identity management.

Alternatives to Friendica and Stalwart

Other Comms products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Friendica or Stalwart.

See all Friendica alternatives → · See all Stalwart alternatives →

Recent activity from Friendica and Stalwart

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 10d agoStalwartv0.16.21
  2. 17d agoStalwartv0.16.20
  3. 22d agoStalwartv0.16.19
  4. 29d agoStalwartv0.16.18
  5. 1mo agoStalwartv0.16.17
  6. 1mo agoStalwartv0.16.16
  7. 3mo agoFriendicaFriendica 2026.05 deepens ATproto and Bridgy Fed support
  8. 7mo agoFriendicaFriendica 2026.01 adds sortable channels and admin block-list portability
  9. 1y agoFriendicaFriendica drops OStatus support in 2024.12
  10. 2y agoFriendicaFriendica 2024.08 adds Zabbix and Grafana monitoring endpoints
  11. 2y agoFriendicaFriendica 2024.03 adds OCR-generated image descriptions
  12. 2y agoFriendicaFriendica 2023.12 makes the Bluesky bridge two-way and ships Channels

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Friendica and Stalwart?

Both compete on the same themes — self-hosted — within Comms. Stalwart is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Friendica better than Stalwart?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Stalwart is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Comms products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Friendica?

Top Friendica alternatives in Comms are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Friendica alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/friendica for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Stalwart?

Top Stalwart alternatives in Comms are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Stalwart alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/stalwart for the full list with editorial commentary on each.