Gold Vision CRM
Gold Vision CRM ships monthly releases on a consistent cadence — changelog details aren't surfaced in the feed.
A side-by-side editorial comparison of Affinity and Phorest — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Affinity is wiring deal data into outside AI tools while rebuilding its core list views.
The tracked source is Affinity's blog index rather than a changelog, so most of what lands here is article chrome and case studies. Underneath that, two genuine product items are visible: Affinity Lists rebuilt for faster performance with advanced filtering, and an Affinity MCP Server in beta that connects deal data to AI tools including Claude, ChatGPT and Gemini. The surrounding material — Speedinvest tracking 500+ LP relationships through automatic capture, a year-in-review post, an executive appointment — is positioning around relationship intelligence rather than shipped change.
Phorest keeps handing salon owners the settings they used to phone support about
Phorest is salon and clinic management software shipping small, well-scoped changes every week or two, written in the voice of the front desk. The recent run is dominated by giving owners control they previously had to request: adding product brands without contacting Phorest, per-staff-per-service pricing, per-staff online booking visibility, and finer permissions on who may edit service versus retail prices. Around that sit operational tools like geofenced clock-in on the mobile app.
The tracked source is Affinity's blog index rather than a changelog, so most of what lands here is article chrome and case studies. Underneath that, two genuine product items are visible: Affinity Lists rebuilt for faster performance with advanced filtering, and an Affinity MCP Server in beta that connects deal data to AI tools including Claude, ChatGPT and Gemini. The surrounding material — Speedinvest tracking 500+ LP relationships through automatic capture, a year-in-review post, an executive appointment — is positioning around relationship intelligence rather than shipped change.
Affinity is pushing on two fronts that reinforce each other: making the CRM's own surfaces fast enough to live in, and making its relationship graph reachable from whatever AI tool a dealmaker already has open. The consistent claim across the entries is automatic capture — email and meeting data collected without manual entry — which is what makes both the network mapping and the agent access worth anything. The category framing is relationship intelligence, not CRM.
The MCP server is in beta and is the obvious next thing to move; watch for it to gain write access to pipeline records rather than read-only querying, since the existing material already describes updating a pipeline from an AI tool.
Phorest is salon and clinic management software shipping small, well-scoped changes every week or two, written in the voice of the front desk. The recent run is dominated by giving owners control they previously had to request: adding product brands without contacting Phorest, per-staff-per-service pricing, per-staff online booking visibility, and finer permissions on who may edit service versus retail prices. Around that sit operational tools like geofenced clock-in on the mobile app.
The through-line is decentralising configuration to the salon and making the booking model match how these businesses actually run. Nearly every recent release either removes a support ticket or lets one staff member be treated differently from another — different price, different online availability, different qualifications. The multi-service booking flow extends the same thinking to the client-facing side, where a visit involving two practitioners was previously modelled as an edge case.
Per-staff settings have now landed for price, online visibility and qualifications separately; the obvious next step is a single staff-level view that shows all three together, since the release notes already admit owners are hopping between screens to check them.
Other CRM products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Affinity or Phorest.
Gold Vision CRM ships monthly releases on a consistent cadence — changelog details aren't surfaced in the feed.
Twenty's sprint through v2.39-v2.40 stabilizes yarn pull and relicenses UI components as MIT.
Close is systematically expanding Chloe from Q&A into an operational CRM layer
Lime Connect adds time-based workflow triggers and interactive UI elements for its AI Agent, deepening its bet on AI-augmented customer communication.
Easy!Appointments 1.6 lands video conferencing, GDPR tools, and a serious security overhaul across its CalDAV and booking stack.
Streak wires automations to email and call activity, turning Gmail CRM into an event-driven workflow engine.
See all Affinity alternatives → · See all Phorest alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Phorest is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Phorest is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other CRM products to evaluate alongside.
Top Affinity alternatives in CRM are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Affinity alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/affinity for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top Phorest alternatives in CRM are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Phorest alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/phorest for the full list with editorial commentary on each.