Mattermost
Mattermost v11.11 adds data spillage exposure tracking as v12.0 breaking changes loom
Comparison · Collab
HumHub vs Joplin
A side-by-side editorial comparison of HumHub and Joplin — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
HumHub vs Joplin: at a glance
What is HumHub?
HumHub's public feed carries only betas, and 1.19's is still about surviving the upgrade.
The four releases visible here are all pre-release: 1.19.0-beta.2 and beta.1, and 1.18.0-beta.6 and beta.5 before them. The 1.19 line is dominated by upgrade-path and data-integrity repair — a foreign key violation aborting the comment content_id migration on databases with orphaned rows, fatal errors when purging content whose underlying record was gone, and in beta.2 a fatal SCSS build loop left behind when the 1.19 move of static/themes into protected/humhub stranded an empty theme skeleton. Beta.2 also fixes a real leak: activities from private spaces appearing in the summary mail and dashboard of users holding only a pending invite or join request.
What is Joplin?
Joplin 3.7 ships AI chat, semantic search, and MCP integration — all off by default, all controllable by the user.
Joplin 3.7 is the product's first real AI release: an in-app chat panel for querying the currently open note, semantic (meaning-based) search across notebooks, and an MCP server that lets external AI assistants connect to Joplin's note graph. The implementation is privacy-first by design — AI is disabled by default, local models (Ollama, LM Studio) are explicitly supported, and cloud AI services only receive the specific note content relevant to a request rather than the full notebook. A companion documentation post published September 14 lays out the privacy model explicitly.
HumHub vs Joplin: editorial side-by-side
HumHub
5.0COLLAB
HumHub's public feed carries only betas, and 1.19's is still about surviving the upgrade.
◆ Current state
The four releases visible here are all pre-release: 1.19.0-beta.2 and beta.1, and 1.18.0-beta.6 and beta.5 before them. The 1.19 line is dominated by upgrade-path and data-integrity repair — a foreign key violation aborting the comment content_id migration on databases with orphaned rows, fatal errors when purging content whose underlying record was gone, and in beta.2 a fatal SCSS build loop left behind when the 1.19 move of static/themes into protected/humhub stranded an empty theme skeleton. Beta.2 also fixes a real leak: activities from private spaces appearing in the summary mail and dashboard of users holding only a pending invite or join request.
◆ Where it's heading
The 1.19 cycle is being spent making the migration survivable on real installations rather than adding capability, which is the usual shape when a schema and directory-layout change meets databases and webroots that have accumulated years of drift. Beta.2 extends that into the installer itself, where an unreachable database was offering to re-set-up a live instance during a transient outage. The permission and visibility fixes point the same way: tightening authorisation and content boundaries is cleanup of an existing model, not an extension of it.
◆ Prediction
Only beta tags appear in this feed, so a 1.19.0 stable is the obvious next milestone, but nothing here dates it. The beta.1-to-beta.2 gap of about a month is a faster rhythm than the roughly six months between the 1.18 and 1.19 betas.
Joplin
6.3COLLAB
Joplin 3.7 ships AI chat, semantic search, and MCP integration — all off by default, all controllable by the user.
◆ Current state
Joplin 3.7 is the product's first real AI release: an in-app chat panel for querying the currently open note, semantic (meaning-based) search across notebooks, and an MCP server that lets external AI assistants connect to Joplin's note graph. The implementation is privacy-first by design — AI is disabled by default, local models (Ollama, LM Studio) are explicitly supported, and cloud AI services only receive the specific note content relevant to a request rather than the full notebook. A companion documentation post published September 14 lays out the privacy model explicitly.
◆ Where it's heading
Joplin is repositioning from a sync-agnostic note-taking app into an AI-native knowledge base, differentiated by opt-in, local-first controls. The HMD Terra M preload partnership and the warrant canary point to a deliberate push toward privacy-conscious enterprise and professional users who distrust cloud-first tools. The MCP integration is particularly strategic: it makes Joplin's note graph accessible to external orchestration pipelines without locking into any particular AI provider.
◆ Prediction
The next major release will likely expand AI chat to multi-note context — currently limited to the open note — and add more configurable MCP tools. The HTR (handwritten text recognition) project from the 2024 French government partnership is also likely to appear in a near-term release.
Alternatives to HumHub and Joplin
Other Collab products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either HumHub or Joplin.
SiYuan
SiYuan v3.8.4 beta cycle adds agent-controlled database fields, MiniMax image gen, and skill file management
GitHub
GitHub Copilot gets cost-aware inference tiers as enterprise AI tooling tightens across the platform.
Nextcloud
Nextcloud runs three LTS branches in parallel, shipping bug fixes and quiet performance wins.
Teable
Teable adds Composio integration and Scheduled Routines, pivoting from spreadsheet to agentic workflow platform.
Happeo
Happeo doubles down on SEO content to own intranet search terms for mid-market buyers.
See all HumHub alternatives → · See all Joplin alternatives →
Recent activity from HumHub and Joplin
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 2d agoJoplinYour notes and AI: privacy first
- 16d agoJoplinWhat's new in Joplin 3.7 ⚡
- 28d agoHumHubPrivate-space activity leak, installer 503 handling and the stranded theme skeleton
- 1mo agoHumHub1.19 upgrade migration and orphaned content fixes
- 4mo agoJoplinWhat's new in Joplin 3.6
- 6mo agoJoplinIntroducing our Warrant Canary
- 7mo agoJoplinJoplin will come preloaded on the HMD Terra M
- 8mo agoJoplinWhat's new in Joplin 3.5
- 8mo agoHumHubLogin screen, theming and validator fixes
- 10mo agoHumHubGroup manager options and assorted UI fixes
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between HumHub and Joplin?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Joplin is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 5.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is HumHub better than Joplin?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Joplin is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 5.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Collab products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to HumHub?
Top HumHub alternatives in Collab are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "HumHub alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/humhub for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to Joplin?
Top Joplin alternatives in Collab are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Joplin alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/joplin for the full list with editorial commentary on each.