← Back to home
Comparison · EdTech

Brilliant vs OpenLearning

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Brilliant and OpenLearning — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Brilliant vs OpenLearning: at a glance

FeatureBrilliantOpenLearning
SectorEdTechEdTech
Velocity score3.85.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesai tutoring, learning games, interactive math, edtechlms-edtech, higher-education, assessments, outcomes-based-learning
Last editorial update3mo ago8d ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is Brilliant?

Brilliant launches Koji, a graphical AI tutor — its first product move in 15 months.

Brilliant ships infrequent, essay-style blog posts that read as much like product manifestos as changelog. The most recent post announces Koji, framed as a graphical AI tutor — the first new headline product in this ten-entry window. The rest of the timeline is course-design philosophy around algebra, programming, and learning-game evals.

Read the full Brilliant trajectory →

What is OpenLearning?

OpenLearning ships steady educator-control improvements while building an editorial position on AI in higher ed.

OpenLearning, an Australian LMS focused on higher education and professional certification, is on a monthly product update cadence covering assessment workflows, course delivery controls, and learner evidence tools. The product detail visible in changelog entries is thin — summaries rather than specifics — but the April update (new logged-in dashboard, redesigned assessor workflow) and the July framing around 'smarter assessment and streamlined delivery' suggest the core investment is in outcomes-based grading infrastructure. A concurrent editorial stream on AI and academic integrity signals the platform is responding to institution-level AI anxiety rather than embedding AI features aggressively.

Read the full OpenLearning trajectory →

Brilliant vs OpenLearning: editorial side-by-side

B
Brilliant
EDTECH
3.8

Brilliant launches Koji, a graphical AI tutor — its first product move in 15 months.

◆ Current state

Brilliant ships infrequent, essay-style blog posts that read as much like product manifestos as changelog. The most recent post announces Koji, framed as a graphical AI tutor — the first new headline product in this ten-entry window. The rest of the timeline is course-design philosophy around algebra, programming, and learning-game evals.

◆ Where it's heading

The throughline across these posts is the same: lean on visual, game-like interaction and use AI to scale the tutor-style feedback loop the team keeps writing about. Koji is the first concrete productization of that thesis after a long stretch of essays describing the approach. Cadence remains slow, which suggests Brilliant publishes only when something is meaningfully different.

◆ Prediction

Expect Koji to roll out across more subjects following the same algebra-then-CS pattern earlier posts described, and for future entries to attach Koji-specific course launches rather than announce new products from scratch.

O5.0

OpenLearning ships steady educator-control improvements while building an editorial position on AI in higher ed.

◆ Current state

OpenLearning, an Australian LMS focused on higher education and professional certification, is on a monthly product update cadence covering assessment workflows, course delivery controls, and learner evidence tools. The product detail visible in changelog entries is thin — summaries rather than specifics — but the April update (new logged-in dashboard, redesigned assessor workflow) and the July framing around 'smarter assessment and streamlined delivery' suggest the core investment is in outcomes-based grading infrastructure. A concurrent editorial stream on AI and academic integrity signals the platform is responding to institution-level AI anxiety rather than embedding AI features aggressively.

◆ Where it's heading

OpenLearning is building toward a credentialed-outcomes position: the assessor workflow redesign, evidence collection, and outcomes-based grading language all point in the same direction. The NSW Digital Athlete case study and monthly forum activity suggest a services-led growth model where content and community anchor institutional sales. Without more product specifics in the changelog, it's hard to judge how fast the platform is moving relative to the broader LMS market.

◆ Prediction

The next product update will likely extend the assessment workflow — either AI-assisted evidence flagging, automated rubric scoring, or expanded integration with institutional student information systems.

Alternatives to Brilliant and OpenLearning

Other EdTech products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Brilliant or OpenLearning.

See all Brilliant alternatives → · See all OpenLearning alternatives →

Recent activity from Brilliant and OpenLearning

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 9d agoOpenLearningWhen Students Turn to AI, Look Beyond Cheating
  2. 1mo agoOpenLearningProduct Updates: July 2026
  3. 2mo agoOpenLearningProduct Updates: June 2026 — Smarter Assessments and Flexible Learning
  4. 3mo agoBrilliantBrilliant introduces Koji, a graphical AI tutor
  5. 3mo agoOpenLearningThe Mind Control Matrix:
Origins, Operations, and Outcomes
  6. 4mo agoOpenLearningThe Making of NSW’s Digital Athlete Program by Learning Plan
  7. 4mo agoOpenLearningProduct Updates: April 2026
  8. 1y agoBrilliantWhen “almost right” is catastrophically wrong: Evals for AI learning games
  9. 1y agoBrilliantHand-crafted, machine-made: How we make learning games with AI
  10. 1y agoBrilliantProgramming in 2025: A preview of our upcoming CS courses
  11. 1y agoBrilliantOne subject, three lenses: A multifaceted look at Algebra
  12. 1y agoBrilliantGame on: Solving for x-citement with interactive Algebra

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Brilliant and OpenLearning?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. OpenLearning is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 3.8), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Brilliant better than OpenLearning?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. OpenLearning is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 3.8), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other EdTech products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Brilliant?

Top Brilliant alternatives in EdTech are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Brilliant alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/brilliant for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to OpenLearning?

Top OpenLearning alternatives in EdTech are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "OpenLearning alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/openlearning for the full list with editorial commentary on each.