← Back to home
Comparison · EdTech

Pear Deck vs Chamilo

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Pear Deck and Chamilo — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Pear Deck vs Chamilo: at a glance

FeaturePear DeckChamilo
SectorEdTechEdTech
Velocity score2.56.3
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesedtech, assessment, ai-workflows, curriculum-alignmentlms, mcp, agentic-authoring, platform-rewrite
Last editorial update29d ago15d ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is Pear Deck?

Pear Deck's feed is mostly pointer entries; the AI assessment workflows are the one real thread.

The feed alternates between contentless release-notes pointers, often captured twice within hours, and a small number of substantive announcements. The substantive ones all concern the same thing: AI workflows across Pear Deck and Pear Assessment for content creation, turning test data into instructional next steps, and curriculum alignment — announced in beta in May and updated in August with AI-assisted test creation and analysis plus district admin coverage controls.

Read the full Pear Deck trajectory →

What is Chamilo?

Chamilo's 3.0 beta quietly turns the LMS into an MCP server agents can author courses through.

Chamilo runs three lines at once. The legacy 1.11 branch takes security and bugfix releases roughly quarterly, 2.0 reached GA in April and has drawn three patch releases since, and a 3.0 line opened on 13 August. The 3.0 beta is where the direction sits: 456 changes spanning 88 plugin fixes, a 44-item security sweep, and a new MCP server with OAuth 2.1 that exposes course authoring and review to outside clients. The feed's own bodies are unreliable here - both 3.0 tags arrived carrying a single line of text, and the 2.0 GA release reached it only as scraped page fragments.

Read the full Chamilo trajectory →

Pear Deck vs Chamilo: editorial side-by-side

Pear Deck logo
Pear Deck
EDTECH
2.5

Pear Deck's feed is mostly pointer entries; the AI assessment workflows are the one real thread.

◆ Current state

The feed alternates between contentless release-notes pointers, often captured twice within hours, and a small number of substantive announcements. The substantive ones all concern the same thing: AI workflows across Pear Deck and Pear Assessment for content creation, turning test data into instructional next steps, and curriculum alignment — announced in beta in May and updated in August with AI-assisted test creation and analysis plus district admin coverage controls.

◆ Where it's heading

The direction is from AI content generation toward AI reading the results, which is the harder and more defensible half for an assessment product. Everything else in the feed is release-notes plumbing, and the district-administration touches suggest the buyer being addressed is the district rather than the individual teacher.

◆ Prediction

Expect the AI assessment workflows to leave beta with the analysis side foregrounded; the pointer entries will keep arriving in duplicate pairs unless the feed source changes.

Chamilo logo
Chamilo
EDTECH
6.3

Chamilo's 3.0 beta quietly turns the LMS into an MCP server agents can author courses through.

◆ Current state

Chamilo runs three lines at once. The legacy 1.11 branch takes security and bugfix releases roughly quarterly, 2.0 reached GA in April and has drawn three patch releases since, and a 3.0 line opened on 13 August. The 3.0 beta is where the direction sits: 456 changes spanning 88 plugin fixes, a 44-item security sweep, and a new MCP server with OAuth 2.1 that exposes course authoring and review to outside clients. The feed's own bodies are unreliable here - both 3.0 tags arrived carrying a single line of text, and the 2.0 GA release reached it only as scraped page fragments.

◆ Where it's heading

The rewrite has stopped being the story and the agent surface has started. 2.0 spent its cycle absorbing the legacy feature set - LTI, ONLYOFFICE, the plugin catalogue - and reached GA; 3.0's first beta spends most of its weight on that same restoration work but adds something no 2.0 release contains, an MCP server with OAuth 2.1 auto-connect and tools that write rather than only read. Model providers are being wired directly into the AI helper alongside it. Security remains constant across all three branches, with 44 security items in the 3.0 beta alone.

◆ Prediction

Expect the MCP tool surface to widen in the next 3.0 beta, since the first pass already moved past read-only lookups into course authoring and review. Whether 3.0 becomes the supported line or 2.0 keeps taking patches is the question the tags themselves do not answer.

Alternatives to Pear Deck and Chamilo

Other EdTech products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Pear Deck or Chamilo.

See all Pear Deck alternatives → · See all Chamilo alternatives →

Recent activity from Pear Deck and Chamilo

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 15d agoChamiloBeta 2 tagged with no release notes
  2. 1mo agoChamiloChamilo 3.0 beta 1 opens an MCP server with course-authoring tools
  3. 1mo agoPear DeckPear Assessment Intelligence & Control Update
  4. 2mo agoChamiloChamilo 1.11.40: security and bugfix maintenance release
  5. 4mo agoPear DeckBETA: AI-powered workflows for data-driven instruction, actionable insights, and curriculum alignment
  6. 4mo agoPear DeckAI-powered workflows for data-driven instruction, actionable insights, and curriculum alignment
  7. 5mo agoChamiloStop logging AI base-provider fallback events
  8. 5mo agoChamiloBump tar dependency 7.5.3 to 7.5.6
  9. 5mo agoChamiloChamilo 2.0 RC3: LTI provider, ONLYOFFICE, and plugin revival
  10. 9mo agoPear DeckPear Assessment Release Notes: December 1, 2025
  11. 9mo agoPear DeckPear Assessment Release Notes: December 1, 2025
  12. 10mo agoPear DeckPear Assessment Release Notes: November 3, 2025

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Pear Deck and Chamilo?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Chamilo is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 2.5), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Pear Deck better than Chamilo?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Chamilo is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 2.5), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other EdTech products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Pear Deck?

Top Pear Deck alternatives in EdTech are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Pear Deck alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/pear-deck for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Chamilo?

Top Chamilo alternatives in EdTech are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Chamilo alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/chamilo for the full list with editorial commentary on each.