Hive vs Mattermost
Side-by-side trajectory, velocity, and editorial themes.
Hive's quarter is mobile parity, with chat and dashboards getting tidied on the side.
Hive is in a steady incremental polish phase. The dominant thread is pulling more of the desktop experience onto mobile: workflow visibility, time tracking from action cards, Gantt views, and a beefed-up universal search all landed within a week of each other. Chat got a parallel set of refinements (inline video, file gallery, history preservation when members leave), and dashboards picked up median aggregation.
Hive looks focused on closing the desktop-mobile gap rather than opening new product surface area. Each mobile release individually is small, but together they push Hive toward being usable as a primary-not-secondary work surface on phones, which matters most for project managers who actually move around. Expect this cleanup arc to continue for at least another release cycle before strategic capabilities (AI, automation depth) reappear.
Next likely additions on mobile: editing or creating actions/workflows (currently view-only) and richer dashboard interaction. On the desktop side, a feature touching AI or workflow authoring is overdue given the cadence of small fixes.
v11.7 ships rearchitected AI agents and granular ABAC as Mattermost leans hard into regulated buyers.
Mattermost is now openly positioning as a collaboration platform for defense, intelligence, and critical infrastructure rather than a general-purpose team-chat alternative. The v11.7 release pairs Attribute-Based Access Control for Team Admins with a rearchitected Agents v2.0 layer that supports custom AI prompts and user-created agents, signaling that the AI roadmap will run on top of strict access governance rather than alongside it. Editorial output in May is overwhelmingly about sovereignty, coalition operations, and AI governance — the company is telling regulated buyers what to ask vendors during procurement.
The product is bifurcating from horizontal team chat into a sovereignty-and-governance-first platform aimed at procurement evaluations in defense and regulated finance. Each major release now ships more granular control surfaces (ABAC, coordinated ESR security cadence) underneath user-facing features (AI agents, custom prompts), which is consistent with a market where features only matter if they can pass a compliance review. Expect future releases to keep coupling AI capability to governance primitives rather than shipping AI features on their own.
The next minor release likely extends ABAC scope beyond Team Admins (channel-level or integration-level enforcement) and tightens the audit trail around user-created agents, since both are the natural follow-ons for a customer base that procures on control granularity. A coalition or cross-domain feature announcement is also plausible given how heavily April-May messaging leaned on multi-nation operational use cases.
See more alternatives to Hive →
See more alternatives to Mattermost →