← Back to home
Comparison · DevOps

Rivet vs HashiCorp

Side-by-side trajectory, velocity, and editorial themes.

R
Rivet
DEVOPS
7.5

Rivet pivots from actor backend to a coding-agent OS, and is building the ecosystem to match.

◆ Current state

Rivet began as an actor and serverless backend platform — RivetKit, Rivet Actors, Rivet Compute — and has spent the last month reorienting around agentOS, a WebAssembly-based Linux environment for running coding agents without a heavy sandbox. The June and July releases show both threads running in parallel: native language SDKs (Rust, Effect) for Actors, and a fast-maturing agentOS that now has its own package registry.

◆ Where it's heading

The center of gravity is shifting from hosting stateful actors to being the runtime coding agents execute inside. agentOS went from a v0.2 sandbox alternative to shipping a package registry and a sub-millisecond package manager in under two weeks, a sign Rivet wants to own the developer surface around agent execution, not just the compute underneath it.

◆ Prediction

Expect agentOS to keep accreting ecosystem pieces — more registry content and tighter orchestration — while the Actors SDKs settle toward maintenance. A likely next move is deeper coupling between agentOS and Rivet Compute so agents run on Rivet's own cloud.

HashiCorp logo
HashiCorp
DEVOPS
8.8

HashiCorp pushes an infrastructure graph and Boundary 1.0 while reorienting around AI-agent access

◆ Current state

HashiCorp is layering two moves on top of its IaC and secrets core: a graph-based source of truth for sprawling multi-cloud estates, and a steady buildout of access control for AI agents. Boundary reached 1.0 with session recording, Vault and Boundary both shipped agent-security previews, and HCP gained SCIM provisioning. The through-line is governing who — and increasingly what — can touch infrastructure.

◆ Where it's heading

Terraform is being repositioned from provisioning tool to system-of-record via Infragraph, while Boundary and Vault extend privileged access from humans to autonomous agents. The AI-agent framing recurs across nearly every release, suggesting HashiCorp sees agent access as the next control-plane contest. Expect the graph and the access layer to knit into a single governance story.

◆ Prediction

Likely next: Infragraph moving from limited to general availability, and more concrete Vault and Boundary primitives for scoping and recording AI-agent sessions.

See more alternatives to Rivet
See more alternatives to HashiCorp