← Back to home
Comparison · Finance

LivePlan vs Pigment

Side-by-side trajectory, velocity, and editorial themes.

L
LivePlan
FINANCE
0.0

LivePlan rebuilds the plan editor and lets you feed it your own files for AI context.

◆ Current state

Two structural moves anchor the period. In late January, LivePlan launched a fully reimagined plan editor — modern templates, custom themes, real-time collaboration with comments, flexible images/charts/tables, and contextual AI writing — and shipped a beta that lets users import notes, spreadsheets, and research so the AI builds on actual business context. Earlier, the forecast editor was rebuilt with a sleeker layout and inline forecast-vs-actuals comparison, and forecast items can now be organized into groups for clearer revenue/cost rollups.

◆ Where it's heading

LivePlan is methodically replacing every legacy editor in the product — first forecasting, then the plan itself — and wiring AI more deeply into each. The reference-files beta is the more telling move: it pulls user context into the model rather than relying on generic templates, which is the only way AI authoring becomes useful for a real lender-facing plan. Together it's a clean shift from "template + spreadsheet" toward "AI co-author with your data."

◆ Prediction

Expect the reference-files beta to graduate and expand to more file types (PDFs, accounting exports), with deeper agentic suggestions that pull numbers and competitive notes directly into the plan. The forecast and plan editors converging — shared collaboration, shared AI writing — is the next natural step.

P
Pigment
FINANCE
5.0

Hardening change management for enterprise planning — granular and local Test and Deploy with deployable User Groups.

◆ Current state

Pigment has spent the last month tightening the deployment story for its enterprise planning platform: granular deployment to push specific changes (not whole environments), local deployment to test inside a Workspace using temporary Application copies, and User Groups now flowing through Test and Deploy with their access assignments. Modeling-side tooling has caught up too — bulk Dimension substitution across Applications, frozen columns in the grid, and contextual BY-formula hover hints. Just outside the 6-entry window, the Modeler Agent and Claude Code/Cursor plugins set the directional tone.

◆ Where it's heading

Two parallel arcs are visible: AI-assisted model construction (Modeler Agent, scheduled Analyst Agent missions, IDE plugins) is widening the on-ramp for new model authors, while the Test and Deploy pipeline is maturing into something resembling proper software CI/CD — enterprise FP&A has historically been weak here, and Pigment is closing the gap. The cluster of releases on or around April 21–28 suggests a coordinated platform release, not just steady-state polish.

◆ Prediction

Expect the Modeler Agent to expand into Application-level scaffolding (full model from a brief, not just templates) and the deployment pipeline to gain CI integration and scheduled deploys. The Claude Code/Cursor plugin pattern will likely lead to a public Pigment SDK or programmable model API for IDE-driven workflows.

See more alternatives to LivePlan
See more alternatives to Pigment