Displayr
Displayr lets users pick Chat's AI model and reasoning level, and pay by the token
Comparison · Analytics
Amundsen vs OpenMetadata
A side-by-side editorial comparison of Amundsen and OpenMetadata — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:data-catalog
Amundsen vs OpenMetadata: at a glance
What is Amundsen?
Amundsen's last release was a config flag, and the feed has been silent for two years
Amundsen ships as several separately versioned components — databuilder, metadata, frontend, common — cut from one repository, and the release feed shows the same changelog republished under three different component tags on the same afternoon. Reading past the tag names, the content is overwhelmingly dependabot bumps, Python compatibility-matrix maintenance and mypy upgrades, with real features appearing a couple of times a year. The final release, databuilder 7.5.1 in August 2024, contains exactly one change: a config option for implicit transactions in the neo4j extractor.
What is OpenMetadata?
OpenMetadata 2.0.8 widens Hex, Sigma and BigQuery coverage while 2.1 waits in release candidates.
OpenMetadata is still in 2.0.x maintenance mode, shipping a release every one to two weeks. 2.0.8 on November 13 is the broadest yet: Hex and Sigma ingestion now build data models and column lineage, BigQuery date-sharded tables can be grouped into one logical table, Power BI and Snowflake ingestion stop leaving stale or runaway jobs, and MCP authentication and access controls were tightened. The 2.1.0 line sits at rc2, whose only published change is a tag-resolution fix.
Amundsen vs OpenMetadata: editorial side-by-side
Amundsen
0.0ANALYTICS
Amundsen's last release was a config flag, and the feed has been silent for two years
◆ Current state
Amundsen ships as several separately versioned components — databuilder, metadata, frontend, common — cut from one repository, and the release feed shows the same changelog republished under three different component tags on the same afternoon. Reading past the tag names, the content is overwhelmingly dependabot bumps, Python compatibility-matrix maintenance and mypy upgrades, with real features appearing a couple of times a year. The final release, databuilder 7.5.1 in August 2024, contains exactly one change: a config option for implicit transactions in the neo4j extractor.
◆ Where it's heading
The direction is contraction. Python 3.7 support was dropped and the matrix narrowed to 3.8 and 3.9 before 3.10 was cautiously added to everything except the metadata service, contributor names moved to emeritus status, and organisations were removed from the README's adopter list. What feature work exists is small and peripheral — a PowerBI logo, aggregated alerts, a gremlin proxy method — rather than anything touching how the catalog works. Nothing has been published since August 2024.
◆ Prediction
There is no signal in these entries of planned work, and a two-year silence following a single-flag release means the practical expectation is no further releases; the component version skew across databuilder, metadata and frontend is now frozen where it stopped.
OpenMetadata
5.0ANALYTICS
OpenMetadata 2.0.8 widens Hex, Sigma and BigQuery coverage while 2.1 waits in release candidates.
◆ Current state
OpenMetadata is still in 2.0.x maintenance mode, shipping a release every one to two weeks. 2.0.8 on November 13 is the broadest yet: Hex and Sigma ingestion now build data models and column lineage, BigQuery date-sharded tables can be grouped into one logical table, Power BI and Snowflake ingestion stop leaving stale or runaway jobs, and MCP authentication and access controls were tightened. The 2.1.0 line sits at rc2, whose only published change is a tag-resolution fix.
◆ Where it's heading
Each 2.0.x release repairs connectors and lineage that 2.0 left incomplete, and the fixes increasingly touch accuracy (correct table identity, lineage that ends at the right model) rather than crashes. MCP keeps appearing in the security sections, which suggests OpenMetadata expects AI tools to read the catalog and is locking that path down before 2.1.
◆ Prediction
A 2.1.0 final is the next visible step, since two release candidates are out; the entries do not yet say what features 2.1 adds beyond the fixes backported to 2.0.x.
Alternatives to Amundsen and OpenMetadata
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Amundsen or OpenMetadata.
Dovetail
Dovetail lets admins choose which connectors members can plug into the workspace.
Dagster
Dagster drops Python 3.10 and lets agents run schedules and sensors through MCP.
OpenHouse
OpenHouse adds time-zone-aware retention and per-database table caps.
Countly
Countly 25.03.59 defaults to Node 26, supports MongoDB 9 and tightens app scoping.
Kubecost
Kubecost cuts three 3.3.2 release candidates in two days, still without notes.
See all Amundsen alternatives → · See all OpenMetadata alternatives →
Recent activity from Amundsen and OpenMetadata
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 22h agoOpenMetadata2.0.8: Hex and Sigma lineage, BigQuery shard grouping, MCP auth
- 1d agoOpenMetadata2.1.0 rc2: fix for tags removed when resolving tag tasks
- 14d agoOpenMetadata2.1.0 rc1 appears, with notes covering only a UI fix
- 17d agoOpenMetadata2.0.7: Pub/Sub, SQL Server and Unity Catalog connector fixes
- 24d agoOpenMetadata2.0.6: ingestion accuracy, safer upgrades, multi-pod fixes
- 1mo agoOpenMetadata2.0.5 restores metadata lost to 2.0 ingestion regressions
- 2y agoAmundsenDatabuilder 7.5.1 adds implicit-transaction config for the neo4j extractor
- 2y agoAmundsenDatabuilder 7.5.0 is dependency bumps and a Python 3.10 matrix
- 2y agoAmundsenMetadata 3.13.0 adds aggregating alerts and a gremlin proxy lookup
- 2y agoAmundsenFrontend 4.3.0 republishes the same changelog under a second tag
- 2y agoAmundsenCommon 0.32.0 republishes the same changelog under a third tag
- 2y agoAmundsenMetadata 3.12.3 clears frontend dependency vulnerabilities
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between Amundsen and OpenMetadata?
Both compete on the same themes — data-catalog — within Analytics. OpenMetadata is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is Amundsen better than OpenMetadata?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. OpenMetadata is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to Amundsen?
Top Amundsen alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Amundsen alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/amundsen for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to OpenMetadata?
Top OpenMetadata alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "OpenMetadata alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/openmetadata for the full list with editorial commentary on each.